************************************************** * HYMITATOR 1.0 * * 2009 - 2012 * * Etienne ANDRE, Ulrich KUEHNE, Romain SOULAT * * Laboratoire Specification et Verification * * ENS de Cachan & CNRS, France * ************************************************** Mode: abstract reachability analysis. Parsing done after 0.001 second. Program checked and converted after 0.003 second. Computing post^1 Computing post^2 Found a counterexample. Fixpoint reached after 2 iterations in 0.021 second: 4 reachable states with 5 transitions. Spurious counterexample! separating predicate: M <= w Computing post^1 Computing post^2 Computing post^3 Found a counterexample. Fixpoint reached after 3 iterations in 0.012 second: 5 reachable states with 6 transitions. Spurious counterexample! separating predicate: w > max Computing post^1 Computing post^2 Computing post^3 Found a counterexample. Fixpoint reached after 3 iterations in 0.024 second: 9 reachable states with 12 transitions. Spurious counterexample! separating predicate: delay + w > max + x Computing post^1 Computing post^2 Computing post^3 Found a counterexample. Fixpoint reached after 3 iterations in 0.04 second: 10 reachable states with 14 transitions. Spurious counterexample! separating predicate: delay + M > max Computing post^1 Computing post^2 Computing post^3 Computing post^4 Computing post^5 Found a counterexample. Fixpoint reached after 5 iterations in 0.068 second: 10 reachable states with 18 transitions. Spurious counterexample! separating predicate: m >= M Computing post^1 Computing post^2 Computing post^3 Computing post^4 Computing post^5 Computing post^6 Found a counterexample. Fixpoint reached after 6 iterations in 0.05 second: 7 reachable states with 11 transitions. Spurious counterexample! separating predicate: min > w Computing post^1 Computing post^2 Computing post^3 Computing post^4 Computing post^5 Computing post^6 Found a counterexample. Fixpoint reached after 6 iterations in 0.117 second: 13 reachable states with 25 transitions. Spurious counterexample! separating predicate: 2*delay + min > w + 2*x Computing post^1 Computing post^2 Computing post^3 Computing post^4 Computing post^5 Computing post^6 Found a counterexample. Fixpoint reached after 6 iterations in 0.199 second: 21 reachable states with 38 transitions. Spurious counterexample! separating predicate: 2*delay + min > m Computing post^1 Computing post^2 Computing post^3 Computing post^4 Computing post^5 Computing post^6 Computing post^7 Fixpoint reached after 7 iterations in 0.117 second: 9 reachable states with 15 transitions. System verified SUCCESSFULLY! Final set of predicates: p0: 2*delay + min > m p1: 2*delay + min > w + 2*x p2: min > w p3: m >= M p4: delay + M > max p5: delay + w > max + x p6: w > max p7: M <= w Abstract initial state projected on parameters: min > 0 & delay >= 0 & 100 >= M & M > m & 10 >= delay & max >= delay + M & m >= 2*delay + min HYMITATOR successfully terminated (after 0.886 second)